Add new comment
Comments are for the page: Opinions and curiosity
I essentially agree with the first part of this essay – actually, I agree strongly.
But the last part slide into generalized abstractions that I could see misuse. I think the Buddhist discussion tool of labeling levels of Truth is incredibly useful. Speaking about deciding when we need to be certain or uncertain about the lineage veracity of a Lama, you state that you care more for pragmatics, I agree. But that is because, I know what I want from a situation and not because of some deep understanding of “emptiness”. I think confusing levels of truth can be a good way to manipulate “Emptiness” to make folks swallow whatever you are preaching.
You can use some Markdown and/or HTML formatting here.
Optional, but required if you want follow-up notifications. Used to show your Gravatar if you have one. Address will not be shown publicly.
If you check this box, you will get an email whenever there’s a new comment on this page. The emails include a link to unsubscribe.